On this page
Before creating a walletCreate a walletBack up the seed phrase offlineImport and recoveryLong-term backup managementBefore creating a wallet
When reviewing Before creating a wallet, separate wallet address, seed phrase, and private key. They may appear in the same workflow, but they represent different layers of the action. On this Create & Back Up a Wallet page, the goal is to build a verifiable mental model rather than depend on a single interface cue. Before approving anything, identify the network, the object being changed, and whether the request matches the task you intended to perform.
A useful routine is to review items in a fixed order: confirm seed phrase, verify private key, inspect network, and keep device environment for later reference. If a page unexpectedly asks for wallet address, stop and verify the source instead of continuing simply because the workflow looks familiar.
From a security perspective, Before creating a wallet should be considered together with private key, network, and device environment. A legitimate review flow does not require you to reveal a seed phrase, private key, or verification code. Requests involving wallet address or seed phrase can change permissions or asset state, so review them individually and reject anything you do not understand.
Create a wallet
In practice, randomness often tells you whether you are in the right context, device security affects the resulting state, and password helps with independent verification afterward. Do not rely only on a success message in the interface. Where on-chain state is involved, compare it with address and initial checks so you can distinguish presentation from the actual network result.
Create a wallet also has failure modes. Congestion, incorrect parameters, insufficient balances, contract conditions, or third-party service changes can produce unexpected results. Start with the objective state of device security, password, and address before retrying. Repeated submissions without understanding the cause can add fees or duplicate actions.
When reviewing Create a wallet, separate password, address, and initial checks. They may appear in the same workflow, but they represent different layers of the action. On this Create & Back Up a Wallet page, the goal is to build a verifiable mental model rather than depend on a single interface cue. Before approving anything, identify the network, the object being changed, and whether the request matches the task you intended to perform.
- randomness
- device security
- password
- address
- initial checks
Back up the seed phrase offline
A useful routine is to review items in a fixed order: confirm paper backup, verify offline medium, inspect word order, and keep completeness for later reference. If a page unexpectedly asks for separate storage, stop and verify the source instead of continuing simply because the workflow looks familiar.
From a security perspective, Back up the seed phrase offline should be considered together with offline medium, word order, and completeness. A legitimate review flow does not require you to reveal a seed phrase, private key, or verification code. Requests involving separate storage or paper backup can change permissions or asset state, so review them individually and reject anything you do not understand.
In practice, word order often tells you whether you are in the right context, completeness affects the resulting state, and separate storage helps with independent verification afterward. Do not rely only on a success message in the interface. Where on-chain state is involved, compare it with paper backup and offline medium so you can distinguish presentation from the actual network result.
Import and recovery
Import and recovery also has failure modes. Congestion, incorrect parameters, insufficient balances, contract conditions, or third-party service changes can produce unexpected results. Start with the objective state of recovery phrase, network, and 地址比对 before retrying. Repeated submissions without understanding the cause can add fees or duplicate actions.
When reviewing Import and recovery, separate network, 地址比对, and phishing risk. They may appear in the same workflow, but they represent different layers of the action. On this Create & Back Up a Wallet page, the goal is to build a verifiable mental model rather than depend on a single interface cue. Before approving anything, identify the network, the object being changed, and whether the request matches the task you intended to perform.
A useful routine is to review items in a fixed order: confirm 地址比对, verify phishing risk, inspect private environment, and keep recovery phrase for later reference. If a page unexpectedly asks for network, stop and verify the source instead of continuing simply because the workflow looks familiar.
Long-term backup management
From a security perspective, Long-term backup management should be considered together with periodic review, no screenshots, and no plaintext cloud copy. A legitimate review flow does not require you to reveal a seed phrase, private key, or verification code. Requests involving do not share or disaster recovery can change permissions or asset state, so review them individually and reject anything you do not understand.
In practice, no screenshots often tells you whether you are in the right context, no plaintext cloud copy affects the resulting state, and do not share helps with independent verification afterward. Do not rely only on a success message in the interface. Where on-chain state is involved, compare it with disaster recovery and periodic review so you can distinguish presentation from the actual network result.
Long-term backup management also has failure modes. Congestion, incorrect parameters, insufficient balances, contract conditions, or third-party service changes can produce unexpected results. Start with the objective state of no plaintext cloud copy, do not share, and disaster recovery before retrying. Repeated submissions without understanding the cause can add fees or duplicate actions.